Quantcast
Channel: Jules M.Ragas
Viewing all 28 articles
Browse latest View live

CORAZON AQUINO- ICON OF EVERYTHING THAT IS WRONG WITH THIS COUNTRY- The Philippines

$
0
0


Corazon Aquino, who died in 2009, is viewed as a saint because some people often compare her to the monster that was Marcos. But ,look at what she had done as president should tell us that she was one deeply FLAWED SAINT.

 "DEBT REPUDIATION was probably the BIGGEST MISTAKE OF CORY AQUINO "

1. When Cory took power, the Philippine foreign debt was around $26 billion. As a supposedly revolutionary government, her regime was well within its right to repudiate that debt, most of which were odious debts anyway. But Cory did not.

She succumbed to the pressure of international creditors, like the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, as well as governments such as the US, which propped up the Marcos (a support that, in turn, allowed him to amass all that debt) and then later propped up Cory. The pressure was such that even Cory’s finance secretary at that time, Jaime Ongpin, threatened to resign if Cory repudiated our debts.”I don’t want the responsibility for a debt repudiation policy on my shoulders, because in my judgment the consequences would be beyond the ability of this government to control,” Ongpin said, according to a New York Times report.

She and her advisers, as well as the central bank, even resisted attempts by legislators and economists to put a cap on debt repayments, to allow the country more breathing space as it tried to pick up the pieces caused by Marcos’s devastation of the Philippine economy. Ongpin said Cory “would have to find someone else to administer the new policy” if the debt-cap proposal was implemented. (Twenty-five years later, Cory’s son, President Noynoy Aquino, also refused any limit on debt repayments, vetoing a provision in the 2011 budget that restricts the government’s borrowings by up to 55 percent of the GDP.)

To be sure, repudiating the debt would have had serious consequences, something that Ongpin and his friends at the IMF and World Bank had warned about (then again, Ongpin et al were also against the idea of a debt-repayment cap of at least 10 percent of export earnings). There are arguments, however, that the advantages to a nation of debt repudiation far outweigh its cost and that, in any case, given the extreme popularity of the Edsa revolt worldwide, the Philippines would have no trouble finding other creditors. Besides, the Philippines was under a revolutionary government at the time. Such a repudiation, or at least a repayment scheme that would be easy on Filipinos and the government, would have been the right thing to do. But Cory did no such thing.

And so, to this day, we are saddled by the effects of this (in)decision, with the largest chunk of our national budget going to interest payments alone, taking away money that should be going to education, health care and other basic services.

Perhaps more than anything else, these debts prevented the Philippines from developing, from breaking from its past. In fact, if there’s one thing that makes Edsa an ersatz revolution, it’s Cory’s failure or refusal to repudiate Marcos’s onerous debts.

2.HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS - While the Marcos dictatorship was responsible for horrendous human rights abuses, it was during Cory’s term that the “total war policy” against leftists and their perceived supporters was launched systematically and cold-bloodedly – a policy that continues to this day, albeit going by other names like Oplan Bantay Laya.

 It was during her term that cannibal vigilantes went on a rampage in the provinces, used by the Philippine military to terrorize villagers and activists.

While Cory Aquino restored democratic institutions and became a symbol of integrity in governance, her regime remained beholden, if not hostaged, by the military and Washington. This resulted in massive human-rights abuses that, based on data from human-rights groups, were even worse in terms of number of victims than those committed so far....

   PROOF:  "816 desaparecidos – the disappeared, or victims of enforced disappearances — during the six years of Cory’s regime. The Task Force Detainees of the Philippines, at the time the country’s leading human-rights group, recorded more than 1.2 million victims of dislocations due to military operations, 135 cases of massacres, 1,064 victims of summary executions, and 20,523 victims of illegal arrest and detention.   "



3. AGRARIAN REFORM FAILURE - Cory was also responsible for the monumental failure of the country’s agrarian reform program. She promised to make it the centerpiece program of her administration and she failed at it miserably, as we can see now. Then again, to believe that a landlord would give away her land just like that is to believe a liar when she says “Trust me.”


It was Cory’s regime that crafted and passed a faulty agrarian-reform law that gave too much leeway to landlords, allowing them to duck the program, and not enough resources to peasants and farmers that would allow them to develop whatever land they would get out of it.

The program was a failure because the Congress was, and still is, dominated by landlords. It was designed to fail. Cory, of all people, should know how silly the idea that landlords would just easily give up their lands.

 
Proof: HACIENDA LUISITA remains in the hands of her family, when it should have been the first one to be parceled out to farmers if she really wanted the program to succeed.

(Need I point out that the Mendiola Massacre and the Lupao Massacre – atrocities that victimized peasants and farmers mainly — occurred during Cory’s term as well?)

Make no mistake: I believe in what many say that Cory was honest and was never corrupt. But she was way too naive and way too vulnerable to the pressures brought to bear on her. More importantly, she simply failed to transcend her own and her family’s interest for the larger good.

Apparently, she was also conflicted about the principle of “people power” itself. This was evident in her 2008 apology to Estrada. Filipinos who struggle for good governance and accountability should take that as an insult and a repudiation of what they stand for.

Corazon Cojuangco Aquino an icon of democracy and moral leadership? To many, perhaps. But to me, she is an icon of everything that is wrong with this country.

DEMOCRAZY!!


References:
Asian correspondent.com
Bulatlat.com


UNTOLD STORY: SCANDALS DURING THE CORAZON AQUINO ADMINISTRATION

$
0
0


One of the biggest urban legends of recent times in the Philippines, is the story that the Cory Administration was supposedly the “cleanest” among the Administrations in the last three decades. Thanks to Nostalgia, and the fact that her Administration was at the dawn of the internet age, much of the negativities of that Administration has been largely forgotten, and people tend to remember only the “good” things about that Administration.

Well, thanks to Noynoy Aquino’s “holier-than-thou” campaign strategy, much of the “unpleasantries” during Cory’s time are being brought back to the surface slowly, but surely. Here are some that I have managed to dig out:

‘Philippine Air Lines Stocks to Nephews’

Cory approved in January 1992 the sale of 67% of the stocks of the Philippine Air Lines (PAL) to an investment group headed by her relatives, composed of one of her Tanjuatco nephews and three of her Cojuangco nephews. The sale resulted in a loss of USD 300-million plus for the Filipino people. The Philippine government, through the Government Service Insurance System (GSIS), owned the shares. And worse, her nephews did not even have the money to pay for the airline stocks. They borrowed the money that they used to pay the GSIS from three Philippine government-owned banks, even using the PAL stocks as collateral.

‘Philippine Air Lines Building Scandal’

“The PAL Scandal,” where Cory authorized in 1992 the sale of the PAL Building in San Francisco, California. It resulted, according to the column of the late journalist Louie Beltran, into a USD 6-million loss to the national airline. Cory did not charge Mr. Beltran with libel on this issue about the PAL Building. She, however, did file a libel case against Mr. Beltran and his publisher, Maximo V. Soliven on a separate issue, when Beltran wrote that Mrs. Aquino “hid under her bed during a coup d’etat attempt at the presidential palace in Manila.”

‘Bargain Sale of Companies to Lopa’

The assets of the Marcoses, the Romualdezes and their cronies were supposed to have been sequestered by the new Aquino administration, but Kokoy Romualdez’s (Ferdinand Marcos Sr.’s brother in law) 38 companies, which were worth billions of pesos, were not turned over to the Presidential Commission on Good Government. Cory instead during her first months in office, permitted the transfer of these 38 companies to her own brother-in-law, Ricardo “Baby” Lopa. What’s worst, was the fact that all 38 companies were bought back by Lopa during the transfer for the price of only USD 227,000.

‘Philippine Long Distance Company to Nephews’

The same case happened with the ownership of the Philippine Long Distance Company. Instead of sequestering the company for the Philippine government (as it was then controlled by the Marcos cronies), she returned the billion-dollar company to her Cojuangco nephews. She claimed that her nephews were illegally eased out by Mr. Marcos. The truth was that the Marcos cronies, whether their money were ill-gotten or not, paid the Cojuangcos the prevailing market-stock prices during the sale of equity that happened between them at the time when Marcos was still president.

‘Re-negotiation of Marcos’ Japanese Loans’

Cory approved the re-negotiation of the loans that Ferdinand Marcos Jr. obtained from Japan. The administration of Mrs. Aquino agreed that the loans would be paid in Japanese yen, rather than in U.S. currency that former Marcos negotiated. This simple change in currency resulted in a USD 5-billion increase in the loan principal.

‘Refusal to Give Hacienda Luisita to Farmers’

Cory publicly promised in 1986 that Hacienda Luisita will be distributed to the farmers. However, in 1987, she issued Presidential Proclamation 131 and Executive Order No. 229 just days before her legislative powers were going to revert back to Congress, to include a provision in the Land Reform program for a “Stock Distribution Option”, which allows landowners to comply with the Land Reform Law without actually giving land to the farmers. Hacienda Luisita of course took this new option, and thus was not redistributed to the farmers.

‘Double Cross of Doy Laurel’

Cory had promised to Doy Laurel that she would let him run the government as Prime Minister after Marcos was ousted, as Cory had no experience in politics. However, in March 1986 she issued Presidential Proclamation No. 3 declaring a revolutionary government, and dissolving the 1973 Constitution. This nullified Laurel’s position as Prime Minister as the Parliament was abolished. This prompted Laurel to break ties with the Aquino regime later.

‘Protecting Hacienda Luisita’s Interests’

Cory continued to protect Hacienda Luisita, even firing Miriam Defensor Santiago from her post at the Department of Agrarian Reform after she told the press her opinion that Cory should inhibit herself as chair of the Presidential Agrarian Reform Council (PARC), which was tasked to make the final decision on Hacienda Luisita’s application for the “Stock Distribution Option” (see section on ‘Refusal to Give Hacienda Luisita to Farmers’ above).

‘Garchitorena Land Scam’

In 1988, a foreclosed property of the United Coconut Planters Bank (UCPB) was sold to Sharp International Marketing for P3.8 million. Before the sale was closed, Sharp tried to sell the same property to the government for P56 million. The sale was eventually approved by the Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR), but only after the price was inflated further to P65 million. The financier of the scam was Romeo Santos, an associate of Cory’s brother, Peping Cojuangco. He was also Cory’s campaign manager in Bicol.

SOURCES


- “The Philippines Cory, Coups and Corruption” by John Greenwald, Jay Branegan and Nelly Sindayen, http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,969186,00.html

- “Hacienda Luisita’s past haunts Noynoy’s future” by Stephanie Dychiu, http://www.gmanews.tv/story/181877/hacienda-luisitas-past-haunts-noynoys-future

- “Cory’s land reform legacy to test Noynoy’s political will” by Stephanie Dychiu, http://www.gmanews.tv/story/182195/corys-land-reform-legacy-to-test-noynoys-political-will

- “The Garchitorena land scam” by Stephanie Dychiu, http://www.gmanews.tv/story/182211/the-garchitorena-land-scam




Obama’s Planned War on China Could be Stymied in the Philippines

$
0
0

I would like to know your thoughts on how Noynoy’s drive for dictatorship coincides with that of the Obama Administration’s (see the controversy surrounding the U.S.’s recent National Defense Authorization Act of 2012) and its drive to antagonize China.


Much has been said about the beefing-up of U.S. military deployment in the Asia-Pacific region, with the Philippines playing a central role. Do you also observe how Noy’s attempt at a power-grab as leading to a justification of the otherwise illegal establishment of a U.S. base in the archipelago? 

(See Mike Billington’s “Obama’s Planned War on China Could be Stymied in the Philippines” – http://larouchephil.com/2012/obamas-planned-war-on-china-could-be-stymied-in-the-philippines/ )

Obama’s Planned War on China Could be Stymied in the Philippines


Feb19/2012- President Barack Obama’s intention to impose the British Empire’s thermonuclear war policy against Asia has rested in part on his “tilt” toward Asia – a tilt which is entirely directed towards economic and military confrontation with China (see “Brits, Obama Push World War Against Russia and China,”http://www.larouchepub.com/eiw/public/2012/2012_1-9/2012-06/pdf/29-31_3906.pdf).

 During his trip to Asia in November, Obama announced two primary military deployments designed to facilitate a war on China — the establishment of huge military bases in Australia, out of range of Chinese missiles, and the reintroduction of Air, Naval and Marine bases in the Philippines. The Philippine bases are crucial as a take off point for air and sea assaults against the mainland of China, under the “Air-Sea Battle” military doctrine recently adopted by the Obama Administration.

There is one problem – the deployment of foreign military bases in the Philippines is explicitly forbidden in the Philippine Constitution.

To solve that pesky impediment, Obama has called upon his faithful puppet currently occupying the Philippine Presidency, Benigno “Noynoy” Aquino, to impose a virtual dictatorship upon the nation, by destroying the Supreme Court – the only institution which could stop the effort to rip up the Constitution and turn the Philippines into a military base, and canon fodder, in the intended war on China.

President Aquino is the son of Cory Aquino, who was placed in office as Presdident of the Philippines in 1986 following the military coup against the nation’s last nationalist leader, Ferdinand Marcos, a “regime change” that was orchestrated by U.S. Secretary of State George Shultz and his Deputy Paul Wolfowitz. As President, Cory faithfully followed the dictates from Washington, shutting down the industrial and agricultural programs Marcos had implemented to transform the Philippines into a modern nation, including the first nuclear power plant in Southeast Asia, a dozen industrial projects, and a rice self-sufficiency program.

The nation has never recovered, and is now totally destitute, within an Asian region which is otherwise experiencing significant progress despite the global economic crisis.

Aquino and Obama – Rip Up the Constitution

President Aquino’s assault against the Supreme Court takes the form of an impeachment of the Chief Justice Renato Corona. There is a degree of pure personal corruption involved on Aquino’s part — the Court recently ruled that the national land reform policy must be implemented at the vast sugar plantation owned by President Aquino and his family, Hacienda Luisita. But the primary purpose is to prevent any discussion of the unconstitutional and suicidal intention of Aquino and Obama to use the nation as a base for world war.

The Supreme Court once before stymied a government plan, under former President Gloria Arroyo, to make part of the southern island of Mindanao an autonomous region under control of certain factions of the Muslim community living there. The fact that this deal would have given the autonomous government the power to allow foreign military bases (contrary to the national Constitution) was one crucial reason for the Supreme Court’s decision to forbid the deal.

Now, Aquino and Obama are implementing the basing policy through outright dictatorial means, attempting to castrate the Supreme Court while preventing the issue from even being discussed in the Congress (which is largely controlled by the President, especially the House). The entire nation is caught up in the melodrama of an impeachment trial now going on in the Senate, and there is virtually no discussion of the illegality of the blatant move to establish the U.S. bases. 

To add farce to insanity, both Aquino and Obama are claiming that the deployment of advanced naval warships and air power, as well as more marine bases (some moving from the current bases in Okinawa), are not “bases” at all, but only “temporary” visits on a “rotating” basis. A similar subterfuge has been used to explain the hundreds of marines based in Mindanao to aid in the war on terrorist elements – “temporarily” there for the past ten years!

Backfire — Impeach Aquino?

There is mounting resistance, especially since the impeachment trial has shown that the prosecution, openly sponsored and promoted by the President (another overt breach of the Constitutional separation of powers), has no evidence of wrong doing, and has even presented banking documents (aimed at showing the Chief Justice had unexplained wealth) which were exposed as fraudulent by the prosecution’s own witness!

The organization “Solidarity for Sovereignty,” co-founded by Butch Valdes, the head of the Philippine LaRouche Society, intervened in the impeachment farce by organizing a series of prayer vigils at the Supreme Court, calling on the Chief Justice and the Catholic Church (and other religious organizations) to fight the impeachment by defending the Constitution, rather than simply defending the Chief Justice himself against contrived charges.

Valdes, speaking on his weekly radio show Sunday night Feb. 19, said in regard to the Aquino-Obama military deals: “The secrecy of this agreement and its dire implications may also be a principal reason as to why [Aquino] is hell-bent on controlling the judiciary as a defacto dictator – so he would not have to explain to the Filipino people why he has placed the lives of 97 million in harm’s way. 

It should be known to all, including Noynoy supporters, that the impeachment trial of Chief Justice Corona, is not merely about the Hacienda Luisita, nor [former President] Gloria M. Arroyo, but more importantly about putting all our lives at risk at a time when a global thermonuclear war is imminent. 

It is our duty to assert our sovereignty as a people, not to be used by any foreign interest, especially a clinically insane American leader, as dispensable human beings in their deadly plan to burn the world.”

Others are speaking out. Former Senator Kit Tatad, who is now a leading advisor to the Vice President Jejomar Binay (Joe Biden, are you listening?)has called for the impeachment not of the Chief Justice, but of President Aquino, for his blatant attack on the Constitutional separation of powers. 

Tatad wrote in an op-ed in the Manila Times Feb. 14 that the last straw was the revelation that the President’s Executive Secretary “started asking individual senators, in the name of the President, not to honor the Supreme Court’s Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) on the opening of [Chief Justice] Corona’s alleged dollar account at the Philippine Savings Bank…. [S]ome senators, speaking in the strictest confidence, revealed having received a call from the Executive Secretary allegedly to transmit an urgent personal request from the President that they not honor the TRO. 

This suggests a constitutional crime of incalculable magnitude, given the President’s oath of office…. No president should ever inveigh against the law, and ask other government officials to defy the law or an order of the highest court, based on its interpretation of the law, just because he does not like or agree with it…. By this very act, PNoy may have rendered himself completely impeachable and unfit to continue in office. He may have placed himself not just above the law but against the law, the exact opposite of what a president should be.”

Chief Justice Corona himself also went public with a call for the President’s impeachment, issuing a public letter stating that “the President has clearly committed an impeachable offense when he came out swinging by openly urging the Senator-Judges to disobey the Constitution he has personally sworn to uphold.”

People’s Power?

President Aquino has attempted to mount a repeat of the “People’s Power” which was used to overthrow Marcos and install his Mother as a puppet President. But despite his support in opinion polls, no one showed up. While the Solidarity for Sovereignty and other organizations rallied 5,000 people to the Supreme Court to defend the Constitution, Aquino’s call for a mass People’s Party rally in favor of his attempt to seize all power flopped, with only 200 people showing up.

Nonetheless, on February 26, in celebration of the 1986 People’s Power, Aquino is calling for a million people to come to the national park in Manila. There are concerns that Aquino could use the occasion to declare a national emergency, to force the issue he is losing in the impeachment process.

President Obama, meanwhile, is praising Aquino for “fighting corruption,” using dictatorial methods much admired by Obama.

If the Filipino people rise to this historic occasion, exposing the criminal and suicidal crimes of their President in his collaboration with Obama, then this small nation could help stop a rush for global war which threatens the very existence of civilization as we know it.

by Mike Billington
02/20/12

Bill of Rights in the Philippines

$
0
0

The most effective way to empower the people is to indoctrinate them of their rights so they will fight for it as individuals and as a community. It is very difficult to exploit an individual or community who knows his rights. 

Many people and communities get abused and exploited because many people don't know their rights. We have to push push for a law that will make the students (elementary and high school) recite the Bill of Rights during Monday morning after the National Anthem.

xxxxx

EXCERPTS FROM THE BILL OF RIGHTS

[Article 3 of the Philippine Constitution]

Section 1.
No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, nor shall any person be denied the equal protection of the laws.

Section 2. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures of whatever nature and for any purpose shall be inviolable, and no search warrant or warrant of arrest shall issue except upon probable cause to be determined personally by the judge after examination under oath or affirmation of the complainant and the witnesses he may produce, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.

Section 3.
(1) The privacy of communication and correspondence shall be inviolable except upon lawful order of the court, or when public safety or order requires otherwise, as prescribed by law.
(2) Any evidence obtained in violation of this or the preceding section shall be inadmissible for any purpose in any proceeding.

Section 4.
No law shall be passed abridging the freedom of speech, of expression, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and petition the government for redress of grievances.

Section 5.
No law shall be made respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. The free exercise and enjoyment of religious profession and worship, without discrimination or preference, shall forever be allowed. No religious test shall be required for the exercise of civil or political rights.

Section 6.
The liberty of abode and of changing the same within the limits prescribed by law shall not be impaired except upon lawful order of the court. Neither shall the right to travel be impaired except in the interest of national security, public safety, or public health, as may be provided by law.

Section 7.
The right of the people to information on matters of public concern shall be recognized. Access to official records, and to documents and papers pertaining to official acts, transactions, or decisions, as well as to government research data used as basis for policy development, shall be afforded the citizen, subject to such limitations as may be provided by law.

Section 8.
The right of the people, including those employed in the public and private sectors, to form unions, associations, or societies for purposes not contrary to law shall not be abridged.

Section 9.
Private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation.

Section 10.
No law impairing the obligation of contracts shall be passed.

Section 11.
Free access to the courts and quasi-judicial bodies and adequate legal assistance shall not be denied to any person by reason of poverty.

Section 12.
(1) Any person under investigation for the commission of an offense shall have the right to be informed of his right to remain silent and to have competent and independent counsel preferably of his own choice. If the person cannot afford the services of counsel, he must be provided with one. These rights cannot be waived except in writing and in the presence of counsel.
(2) No torture, force, violence, threat, intimidation, or any other means which vitiate the free will shall be used against him. Secret detention places, solitary, incommunicado, or other similar forms of detention are prohibited.
(3) Any confession or admission obtained in violation of this or Section 17 hereof shall be inadmissible in evidence against him.
(4) The law shall provide for penal and civil sanctions for violations of this section as well as compensation to the rehabilitation of victims of torture or similar practices, and their families.

Section 13.
All persons, except those charged with offenses punishable by reclusion perpetua when evidence of guilt is strong, shall, before conviction, be bailable by sufficient sureties, or be released on recognizance as may be provided by law. The right to bail shall not be impaired even when the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus is suspended. Excessive bail shall not be required.

Section 14.
(1) No person shall be held to answer for a criminal offense without due process of law.
(2) In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall be presumed innocent until the contrary is proved, and shall enjoy the right to be heard by himself and counsel, to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation against him, to have a speedy, impartial, and public trial, to meet the witnesses face to face, and to have compulsory process to secure the attendance of witnesses and the production of evidence in his behalf. However, after arraignment, trial may proceed notwithstanding the absence of the accused: Provided, that he has been duly notified and his failure to appear is unjustifiable.

Section 15.
The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended except in cases of invasion or rebellion, when the public safety requires it.

Section 16.
All persons shall have the right to a speedy disposition of their cases before all judicial, quasi-judicial, or administrative bodies.

Section 17.
No person shall be compelled to be a witness against himself.

Section 18.
(1) No person shall be detained solely by reason of his political beliefs and aspirations.
(2) No involuntary servitude in any form shall exist except as a punishment for a crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted.

Section 19.
(1) Excessive fines shall not be imposed, nor cruel, degrading or inhuman punishment inflicted. Neither shall death penalty be imposed, unless, for compelling reasons involving heinous crimes, the Congress hereafter provides for it. Any death penalty already imposed shall be reduced to reclusion perpetua.
(2) The employment of physical, psychological, or degrading punishment against any prisoner or detainee or the use of substandard or inadequate penal facilities under subhuman conditions shall be dealt with by law.

Section 20.
No person shall be imprisoned for debt or non-payment of a poll tax.

Section 21.
No person shall be twice put in jeopardy of punishment for the same offense. If an act is punished by a law and an ordinance, conviction or acquittal under either shall constitute a bar to another prosecution for the same act.

PRIVATIZATION OF ENERGY SYSTEM IN PHILIPPINES

$
0
0


Did you know?

The MARCOS government [in the 1970s] wanted to build 8 to 12 nuclear power plants, on contract with Westinghouse Electric. This was BLOCKED,  as part of the process of the overthrow of the Marcos Administration. 

The only plant which was nearly completed, a 1,400 megawatt plant located in Bataan, was shut down by the AQUINO GOVERNMENT  [installed after the 1986 overthrow of Marcos—also orchestrated by Ramos]. 

If the Marcos plan had been implemented, the Philippines would have had SUFFICIENT ENERGY, so that it would not have been forced into the sweetheart deals later concluded by RAMOS with the power producers.

Under CORY AQUINO -  NO NEW ENERGY generating capacity was added.

RAMOS Given Emergency Powers

Nine months after RAMOS became President in June 1992, under pressure of (possibly contrived) energy shortages and threats from the IMF and World Bank, the Congress granted Ramos emergency powers to deal with the energy crisis. 

The President was authorized to exempt private power projects from public bidding, grant 100% foreign ownership, revamp Napocor, override a Supreme Court decision preventing the raising of energy prices, and grant virtually any other conditions demanded by the foreign energy producers. He did exactly that.

Under the emergency powers, RAMOS instructed Napocor to sign deals with private providers of electricity, called independent power producers, or IPPs. 

The deals stipulated that Napocor must purchase a fixed quota of electricity from the IPPs every year, at a fixed price, whether the electricity was needed or not. This was justified by projections that the demand for energy would rise dramatically in the future, projections that were grossly exaggerated.

Dozens of IPPs were constructed under these conditions. The plan was hailed by the financiers, and singled out in reports by the World Bank and the ADB, as models for all of Asia and the entire underdeveloped world. 

Rahul Khullar of the ADB enthused that the difference between these power contracts and such projects as toll roads, is that “the government is not able to guarantee road users will be willing to pay the going tariff rates. 

For power, on the other hand, such risks do not exist. The government can simply pledge to buy a certain quota in advance.” The added benefits, he said, according to the Oct. 2, 1995 London Financial Times, were that the IPPs were “eligible for tax holidays, the right to import capital equipment duty free, and government-backed foreign exchange guarantees.”

To see the RESULTS  of this SCAM we need only read a Financial Times article published in the Dec. 16, 1999 issue of AsiaWeek: “The IPP deals were made in the early 1990s, when the country was desperate for generating capacity amid blackouts of as long as 12 hours a day. 

At the time, the government of RAMOS got emergency authority to negotiate power contracts without bothering with cumbersome bidding and review.

“The projects were approved based on demand forecasts that have now proven excessive. ‘The anticipated growth [in demand] did not happen because of the Asian Crisis,’ says Secretary Tiaoqui. ‘Instead there was a decline.’ (Similarly in Hong Kong, the government had authorized capacity expansion by CLP, one of the country’s two power utilities, only to see consumption drop and consumers get hit with nearly $440 million in excess charges.) 

Eventually, the NPC (Napocor) or its future owners may have to negotiate lower fees or purchases. It now buys 48% of its power from private suppliers at about 6.5¢ a kilowatt-hour [kwh]—some 20% more than what Meralco (the private energy company owned by the Lopez interests) pays its IPPs. Plus the NPC uses only half the electricity it buys, at a cost of $1.1 billion a year.

 That’s an annual loss of some $550 million.”
Napocor Would Have Been Profitable

The AsiaWeek article also reported: “Last year [1998] the company … lost $90 million on revenues of $2.45 billion, mainly due to having to buy IPP power. For this year’s red ink, it has to borrow $170 million from the government.”

But if the $550 million payoff to the IPPs is taken into consideration, Napocor actually had a $380 million surplus, rather than a $170 million loss!

Thus, while Napocor is being privatized under the excuse that it is losing money, and would be more efficient and profitable under private, deregulated ownership, the fact is, that Napocor actually would be profitable, were it not for this theft, brought about through the collusion of the same government and private concerns which are now demanding full privatization and deregulation.

But, there is more. Let us look at the $550 million that NPC paid to the IPPs, and for which it actually got electricity in return. As we saw, Napocor paid for this electricity at 6.5¢ per kilowatt-hour, which is 20% more than private company Meralco paid for its electricity from the IPPs. Thus, Napocor overpaid 20% for the $550 million worth of electricity it received, an overcharge of $110 million on that account.

Napocor therefore paid $550 million in overcharge for electricity it did not receive, and $110 million in overcharge for electricity it did receive, a total overcharge of $660 million to the people of the Philippines.

If we return to the above example, in 1999, were it not for the $660 million overcharge, Napocor would have had a $490 million surplus, money that could have gone for new power plants, transmission lines, and improved maintenance. There is more, but the point is established.

 There is also the question of what to do with the “Stranded Debt Costs,” which are placed at approximately $5.4 billion, but could be twice that amount. 

These are the “UNPAID OBLIGATIONS "which Napocor has not recouped by charging higher rates. These costs, fully the result of theft through collusion, are to be gouged from the population, either through taxes, higher energy costs, or, as proposed by Energy Secretary Camacho, through the use of royalties from the huge Malampaya gas fields being developed by Shell and Texaco—i.e., by giving away the nation’s patrimony to the thieves, foreign and domestic.

Over the years since the 1993 RAMOS emergency measures, the cumulative amount of loot that these forces took out of Napocor totalled an estimated $2.5-$4 billion, if not more. Energy deregulation would now come back for more.

In 1993-94, these same international financiers pushed through other coordinated measures to make the Philippines more amenable to their looting: measures that restructured/liberalized the central bank, including the elimination of exchange controls which stood in the way of speculators, and a measure to privatize the water system, which has proven to be a DISASTER.
..

MARCOS WEALTH- ILL GOTTEN WEALTH

$
0
0
Did you know about - MARCOS GOLD?

This was the "MARCOS WEALTH" that some POLITICIAN and CHURCHMEN kept on saying was the:
 
" ILL - GOTTEN " Marcos Wealth..


Brief History


From 1866 to 1898 , Prince Julian Macleod Tallano, who became titleholder of OCT 01-4 in 1864 - ORIGINAL CERTIFICATE OF TITLE 01-4 PROTOCOL ,The number 01 refers to the ONE NATION, known in pre - Hispanic times as MAHARLIKA. The number 4 refers to the original four regions og this nation:(1) Luzon  (2) Visayas (3) Mindanao (4) Palawan , has been frequenting the Vatican.

In 1934, under Pope PiusXII , the Vatican negotiated with the member of the Filipino Royal Family, the Christian Tallano clan in Maharlika. An agreement was reached that 640,000 metric tons of the Tallano gold would be LENT to the Pope. This was part of that gold accumulated by the Southeast Asian Srivijayan/Madjapahit Empire during its glorious reign of 900 years.

In 1939, two members of the Tallano family and Roman Catholic Priest , Fr. Jose Antonio Diaz brought the gold from Kota Kinabalu , Sabah to the Vatican.

After doing this, Fr Diaz went back to the Maharlika and resided in Cabanatuan City.

After World War II , he facilitated the safe return of the 640,000 metric tons of GOLD from the Vatican tovthe Maharlika .Manuel Acuna Roxas( relative of the Acuna/ Tagean/ Tallano clan), then a congressman, and Bishop Enrique Sobrepena Sr, in the presence of Atty. Lorenzo Tanada, RECEIVED the gold in Manila.

*************************
There is good reason to believe, even from further along in this account , that the young attorney FERDINAND E. MARCOS was involved in the return of the GOLD. Certainly by all accounts we have seen jt was Ferdinand Marcos and Diaz who shared in the enormous 30% commission- that is 192,000 TONS of Gold worth around $4 TRILLION today(2006) - for handling this transaction.

WHO CAN SAY THIS WEALTH WAS " ILL- GOTTEN"?

**************************

A lease agreement was made between the Tallano clan and the Maharlika government. A total of 640,000 metric tons of gold was deposited in the newly installed Central Bank of the Maharlika to comply with its requirement for GOLD RESERVE. Under the terms of the contract , the Central Bank became the HOLDER of that gold. That LEASE agreement will EXPIRE in the year 2005.

~~~The Tallano Foundation has given notice of the termination of this 50 year lease following the additional 5 year discretionary period on December 31,2005 but remains unable to obtain an inventory of this asset even though the CENTRAL BANK( now Bangko Sentral Pilipinas ) is no longer entitled to HOLD the gold.~~~

****************
Having gained the trust and confidence of Fr Diaz, the Tallano clan made him the main negotiator and trustee of their gold. Fr Diaz in turn, hired the services of ATTY. FERDINAND E MARCOS. , then a RECOMMENDED BRILLIANT YOUNG LAWYER having attained notoriety when he successfully defended himself in the " NALUNDASAN CASE" in 1939. 

Tha TALLANO  clan paid commission to Fr. Diaz and Atty .Marcos in gold, 30% From the principal of 640, 000 metric  tons.

*****************
In 1949. The two richest men in the world were Fr. Jose Antonio Diaz and Atty. Ferdinand E. Marcos . Between the two of them they legitimately earned and owned 192,000 metric tons of GOLD- from TALLANO CLAN and Maharlika Government.


Ferdinand Marcos withdrew their share of the gold from the Central Bank and minted it " RP -CB". Sometime later, Fr.Diaz and Marcos brought their gold to SWITZERLAND , in the SWISS BANK CORPORATION in Zurich.

The remaining 400,000 metric tons of TALLANO GOLD- ( Prince Lacan Acuna Macleod Tallano- son of Rajah Soliman Tagean and grandson of Maharajah Luisong Tagean) is in the third floor basement of the CENTRAL BANK MINTING PLANT in East Ave. Quezon City.

There are 950,000 metric tons of Gold  (declearedmissing in the International Court of Justice) picked up by Yamshita  from its European ally, Hitler.

..... Let's review some numbers at this point because there are certainly  some unexplained LOSSES along the way.

The Tagean- Tallano gold started at 720,000 tons . 640,000 tons were transported to the Vatican and back, leaving 80,000 tons unaccounted from the outset.

Out of 640,000 tons, 192,000 tons were paid in commission, which should be leave 448,000 tons- but somehow hat number as become 400,000 tons , leaving another 48,000 tons unaccounted.

Following this story there are 128,000 (80,000 plus 48,000) tons of gold which somehow " slipped through the cracks" in addition to 192,000 earned in commission, WHEREABOUTS UNKNOWN.. Opppsss!!!

Out of the remaining 400,000 tons we do not know how much remains. We know there was an effort to do a major " disappearing act" when the old Central Bank morphed into the new Bangko Sentral Pilipinas- but a recent decision of the SUPREME COURT ( Banco Filipino versus BSP ) has upheld that BSP is responsible for the liabilities of the old Central Bank.

~~~~~ 
The POINT is that ultimately , a complete accounting should show where  ALL of the original 720, 000 tons  WENT- not to mention estimated 1.2 MILLION tons of Yamashita treasure ( combined German and Japanese plunder) identified above ( that is very nearly TWO MILLION TONS OF GOLD worth more than $38 TRILLION at todays price 2006)

~~~~~

The phony, CIA  backed EDSA " PEOPLE POWER " exhibition of 1986 had one primary purpose and that was to take this vast QUANTITY OF GOLD from the Philippines and the FILIPINO PEOPLE for the benefit of the INTERNATIONAL BANKING CARTEL  to enslave mankind.

~~~~~~

WHAT ABOUT FR. DIAZ COMMISSION SHARED WITH FERDINAND MARCOS?

......When Fr. Jose Antonio Diaz , died in 1974 all the 30% COMMISSION in gold became the legendary " MARCOS GOLD"  . After providing for his family in Marcos ' Letter of Instruction, the whole wealth derived from this was supposed to be given to the FILIPINO PEOPLE . This was the "MARCOS WEALTH" that some POLITICIAN and CHURCHMEN kept on saying was the:
 
" ILL - GOTTEN " Marcos Wealth..

WHY THIS WEALTH HAS BEEN LABELED " ILL - GOTTEN " a little further along in our STUDY , that unti today is in MARCOS SECRET ACCOUNTS.

- On April 9, 1973 Marcos said: "MY EARTHLY GOODS HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE CUSTODY AND FOR THE DISPOSITION OF THE MARCOS FOUNDATION DEDICATED TO THE WELFARE OF THE FILIPINO PEOPLE."

In his GRAND PLAN, MARCOS  wanted to RE ESTABLISHED the former grandeur of MAHARLIKA and the whole region of SOUTHEAST ASIA , the former MALAYAN EMPIRE. 

In June 1983, Marcos appeared before the First World leaders in Toronto. He announced his plan to boost economy of the Southeast Asia Region by creating ASIAN DOLLAR.  This would be backed up by the 400,000 metric tons of gold in Central Bank.

The ASIAN DOLLAR , backed up by the two thirds of all gold in the world that was in the Maharlika. Would made the Maharlika money more valuable and stronger that the American dollar. This was his vision to raise Southeast Asia to be par with the rest of the first world countries.

There is plenty of solid evidence of a program MARCOS worked on with American President Ronald Reagan, which referred to as the ABL ( ANG BAGONG LIPUNAN) program. Under this program some 250 sets of gold , documentation and related ABL currency were to be shipped to various countries around the world.

~~~~~
WHAT BECAME OF THE REMAINING 400,000 metric TONS PERTAINING TO THE TAGEAN - TALLANO CLAN and where is it today?

To this day, the 400,000 metric tons of GOLD are still in the CENTRAL BANK in East Avenue , Quezon City. NOBODY CAN MOVE it because Marcos insured it with the LLOYDS OF LONDON and its agents are guarding it. 

~~~ BUT THE PRESENT GOVERNMENT DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ITS EXISTENCE.~~~~~

Not only have SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS of the Philippines failed to ACKNOWLEDGE  the existence of the GOLD, they have CONSPIRED to keep this information from being KNOWN  to the Filipino People.

We assume this is because they have been working at ways to convert the GOLD for their own selfish gain, probably in conspiracy with the International Banking Cartel.

~~~~~

Immediately after Ferdinand Marcos was REMOVED from the office by a U.S MILITARY helicopter , the NEWLY installed PRESIDENT CORAZON AQUINO , formed the PCGG- Presidential Commission on Good Government, PURPORTEDLY to go after the Marcos - ILL GOTTEN WEALTH.

" IT WAS VERY IMPORTANT TO THE CONSPIRATORS THAT THIS WEALTH SHOULD BE LABELLED ~~ILL - GOTTEN~~ even though, as has already been shown , MR MARCOS was in his OWN RIGHT the WEALTHIEST MAN  on the face of the EARTH and had absolutely no need to take anything from anyone.

~~~

A decision of the FEDERAL SUPREME COURT OF SWITZERLAND dated December 21,1990 said......"... By decision of May 29,1986 , the attorney general of District of Zurich accepted in principle to the legal assistance requested by the PHILIPPINES and invited all the banks of the City of Zurich to FREEZE IMMEDIATELY all the accounts, deposits or safes of the persons, companies or foundations ( of MARCOS) in the order...."

~~~~~~~

THE ACCOUNTS WERE FROZEN  at the request of the government of the Philippines and the PCGG has ensured they have remained FROZEN to this day.

~~~~~~~

This is all a GRAND SCHEME OR SCAM. BLINDED Filipinos must keep repeating that MARCOS was a THEIF ( MAGNANAKAW) so that those HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS of DOLLARS of Marcos Money  will remain FROZEN and not be given to them for their use..

Consequently, they MUST CONSTANTLY BORROW MONEY from International Monetary Fund( IMF) and World Bank ( WB) with SO MUCH INTEREST so that this COUNTRY WILL REMAIN A SLAVE and SHACKLED to the foreign powers.

HISTORY will show that the money was not stashed away and inaccessible but AVAILABLE to truly deserving Filipinos.

There was NOTHING SECRET about Marcos Accounts. These ACCOUNTS were ONLY MADE SECRET by some people in the government so that the PUBLIC would not know its REAL STORY.

GOLD FOR GOLD , DOLLAR FOR DOLLAR, this country , the Maharlika is the RICHEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD.

During a talk show in U.S TV the week following the bombing of the New York Twin Towers, PRES BUSH was asked this question:

WHICH IS THE RICHEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD TODAY ? With a smile :) he said : THE PHILIPPINES, Marcos knew it, but he could not talk.

At the time they made sure that MARCOS  would not longer talk. After kidnapping him from Malacanang , they put him in a golden prison in Hawaii.

So much about the SARSUELA of the 1986 EDSA PEOPLE POWER REVOLUTION, the Roman Catholic Archbishops, his priests, the seminarians, his nuns, and his FOLLOWERS who just PRAY, PAY AND OBEY. These TRAITORS on the Filipino people  did a good job IN FAVOR OF THOSE TWO FOREIGN ALMIGHTY POWERS.

DEMOLITION CAMPAIGN AGAINST THE FILIPINO PEOPLE.

The invisible and long arm of the the foreign powers are now EXPOSED AND BROUGHT to light so that everyone will see the real , greater and hidden MANIPULATORS and AUTHORS of the miseries of this country today.

On FEBRUARY 28, 1986 ( two days after Cory Aquino was sworn as President  but before the proclamation of her Revolutionary Government throught Proclamation No.3 on March 25, 1986, Cory Aquino created the PCGG  through her Executive Order No. 1 section 2 says: 

" The Commission shall be charged with the task of assissting the President in regard to the following matters:

a. The recovery of all ill- gotten wealth accumulated by the Former Resident Ferdinand Marcos , his immediate family, relatives

B. The investigation of such cases of graft and corruption..

So far, the PCGG had succeeded in sequestering 88 BILLION PESOS, allegedly the " ill- gotten wealth" of Marcos. 

UNFORTUNATELY, THE GOLD OF MARCOS HAS, SO FAR , ELUDED IT.

PRESIDENT FERDINAND E. MARCOS  had a wonderful VISION MIND for his people and for the people of the world, as can be presumed from his efforts to implement the ABL PROGRAM mentioned above. But he had some problems.

Marcos could not announce possession of the gold plundered by the Germans and the Japanese during World War Two until some time after 1986 because of the ruling of the International Criminal Court in 1976. 

Today, the truth can be made known and shouted from the rooftops: THE PHILIPPINES IS THE RICHEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD..

ACCORDINGLY, anything YOU can do SPREAD this FACTUAL INFORMATION FAR AND WIDE THROUGHOUT THE PHILIPPINES - and the rest of the WORLD- BRINGS that day closer to REALITY...

Postedby:
www.julesragas.com
//facebook.com/jules24.ragas

REFERENCE: PHOENIX JOURNAL REVIEW
                        Volume 47 Number 12
                         August 9, 2006

CORAZON AQUINO- untold story!

$
0
0


CORAZON AQUINO- ICON OF EVERYTHING THAT IS WRONG WITH THIS COUNTRY- The Philippines


Corazon Aquino, who died in 2009, is viewed as a saint because some people often compare her to the monster that was Marcos. But ,look at what she had done as president should tell us that she was one deeply FLAWED SAINT.

 "DEBT REPUDIATION was probably the BIGGEST MISTAKE OF CORY AQUINO "

1. When Cory took power, the Philippine foreign debt was around $26 billion. As a supposedly revolutionary government, her regime was well within its right to repudiate that debt, most of which were odious debts anyway. But Cory did not.

She succumbed to the pressure of international creditors, like the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, as well as governments such as the US, which propped up the Marcos (a support that, in turn, allowed him to amass all that debt) and then later propped up Cory. The pressure was such that even Cory’s finance secretary at that time, Jaime Ongpin, threatened to resign if Cory repudiated our debts.”I don’t want the responsibility for a debt repudiation policy on my shoulders, because in my judgment the consequences would be beyond the ability of this government to control,” Ongpin said, according to a New York Times report.

She and her advisers, as well as the central bank, even resisted attempts by legislators and economists to put a cap on debt repayments, to allow the country more breathing space as it tried to pick up the pieces caused by Marcos’s devastation of the Philippine economy. Ongpin said Cory “would have to find someone else to administer the new policy” if the debt-cap proposal was implemented. (Twenty-five years later, Cory’s son, President Noynoy Aquino, also refused any limit on debt repayments, vetoing a provision in the 2011 budget that restricts the government’s borrowings by up to 55 percent of the GDP.)

To be sure, repudiating the debt would have had serious consequences, something that Ongpin and his friends at the IMF and World Bank had warned about (then again, Ongpin et al were also against the idea of a debt-repayment cap of at least 10 percent of export earnings). There are arguments, however, that the advantages to a nation of debt repudiation far outweigh its cost and that, in any case, given the extreme popularity of the Edsa revolt worldwide, the Philippines would have no trouble finding other creditors. Besides, the Philippines was under a revolutionary government at the time. Such a repudiation, or at least a repayment scheme that would be easy on Filipinos and the government, would have been the right thing to do. But Cory did no such thing.

And so, to this day, we are saddled by the effects of this (in)decision, with the largest chunk of our national budget going to interest payments alone, taking away money that should be going to education, health care and other basic services.

Perhaps more than anything else, these debts prevented the Philippines from developing, from breaking from its past. In fact, if there’s one thing that makes Edsa an ersatz revolution, it’s Cory’s failure or refusal to repudiate Marcos’s onerous debts.

2.HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS - While the Marcos dictatorship was responsible for horrendous human rights abuses, it was during Cory’s term that the “total war policy” against leftists and their perceived supporters was launched systematically and cold-bloodedly – a policy that continues to this day, albeit going by other names like Oplan Bantay Laya.

 It was during her term that cannibal vigilantes went on a rampage in the provinces, used by the Philippine military to terrorize villagers and activists.

While Cory Aquino restored democratic institutions and became a symbol of integrity in governance, her regime remained beholden, if not hostaged, by the military and Washington. This resulted in massive human-rights abuses that, based on data from human-rights groups, were even worse in terms of number of victims than those committed so far....

   PROOF:  "816 desaparecidos – the disappeared, or victims of enforced disappearances — during the six years of Cory’s regime. The Task Force Detainees of the Philippines, at the time the country’s leading human-rights group, recorded more than 1.2 million victims of dislocations due to military operations, 135 cases of massacres, 1,064 victims of summary executions, and 20,523 victims of illegal arrest and detention.   "



3. AGRARIAN REFORM FAILURE - Cory was also responsible for the monumental failure of the country’s agrarian reform program. She promised to make it the centerpiece program of her administration and she failed at it miserably, as we can see now. Then again, to believe that a landlord would give away her land just like that is to believe a liar when she says “Trust me.”


It was Cory’s regime that crafted and passed a faulty agrarian-reform law that gave too much leeway to landlords, allowing them to duck the program, and not enough resources to peasants and farmers that would allow them to develop whatever land they would get out of it.

The program was a failure because the Congress was, and still is, dominated by landlords. It was designed to fail. Cory, of all people, should know how silly the idea that landlords would just easily give up their lands.

 
Proof: HACIENDA LUISITA remains in the hands of her family, when it should have been the first one to be parceled out to farmers if she really wanted the program to succeed.

(Need I point out that the Mendiola Massacre and the Lupao Massacre – atrocities that victimized peasants and farmers mainly — occurred during Cory’s term as well?)

Make no mistake: I believe in what many say that Cory was honest and was never corrupt. But she was way too naive and way too vulnerable to the pressures brought to bear on her. More importantly, she simply failed to transcend her own and her family’s interest for the larger good.

Apparently, she was also conflicted about the principle of “people power” itself. This was evident in her 2008 apology to Estrada. Filipinos who struggle for good governance and accountability should take that as an insult and a repudiation of what they stand for.

Corazon Cojuangco Aquino an icon of democracy and moral leadership? To many, perhaps. But to me, she is an icon of everything that is wrong with this country.

DEMOCRAZY!!!!!
-------------

UNTOLD STORY: SCANDALS DURING THE CORAZON AQUINO ADMINISTRATION

One of the biggest urban legends of recent times in the Philippines, is the story that the Cory Administration was supposedly the “cleanest” among the Administrations in the last three decades. Thanks to Nostalgia, and the fact that her Administration was at the dawn of the internet age, much of the negativities of that Administration has been largely forgotten, and people tend to remember only the “good” things about that Administration.

Well, thanks to Noynoy Aquino’s “holier-than-thou” campaign strategy, much of the “unpleasantries” during Cory’s time are being brought back to the surface slowly, but surely. Here are some that I have managed to dig out:

‘Philippine Air Lines Stocks to Nephews’

Cory approved in January 1992 the sale of 67% of the stocks of the Philippine Air Lines (PAL) to an investment group headed by her relatives, composed of one of her Tanjuatco nephews and three of her Cojuangco nephews. The sale resulted in a loss of USD 300-million plus for the Filipino people. The Philippine government, through the Government Service Insurance System (GSIS), owned the shares. And worse, her nephews did not even have the money to pay for the airline stocks. They borrowed the money that they used to pay the GSIS from three Philippine government-owned banks, even using the PAL stocks as collateral.

‘Philippine Air Lines Building Scandal’

“The PAL Scandal,” where Cory authorized in 1992 the sale of the PAL Building in San Francisco, California. It resulted, according to the column of the late journalist Louie Beltran, into a USD 6-million loss to the national airline. Cory did not charge Mr. Beltran with libel on this issue about the PAL Building. She, however, did file a libel case against Mr. Beltran and his publisher, Maximo V. Soliven on a separate issue, when Beltran wrote that Mrs. Aquino “hid under her bed during a coup d’etat attempt at the presidential palace in Manila.”

‘Bargain Sale of Companies to Lopa’

The assets of the Marcoses, the Romualdezes and their cronies were supposed to have been sequestered by the new Aquino administration, but Kokoy Romualdez’s (Ferdinand Marcos Sr.’s brother in law) 38 companies, which were worth billions of pesos, were not turned over to the Presidential Commission on Good Government. Cory instead during her first months in office, permitted the transfer of these 38 companies to her own brother-in-law, Ricardo “Baby” Lopa. What’s worst, was the fact that all 38 companies were bought back by Lopa during the transfer for the price of only USD 227,000.

‘Philippine Long Distance Company to Nephews’

The same case happened with the ownership of the Philippine Long Distance Company. Instead of sequestering the company for the Philippine government (as it was then controlled by the Marcos cronies), she returned the billion-dollar company to her Cojuangco nephews. She claimed that her nephews were illegally eased out by Mr. Marcos. The truth was that the Marcos cronies, whether their money were ill-gotten or not, paid the Cojuangcos the prevailing market-stock prices during the sale of equity that happened between them at the time when Marcos was still president.

‘Re-negotiation of Marcos’ Japanese Loans’

Cory approved the re-negotiation of the loans that Ferdinand Marcos Jr. obtained from Japan. The administration of Mrs. Aquino agreed that the loans would be paid in Japanese yen, rather than in U.S. currency that former Marcos negotiated. This simple change in currency resulted in a USD 5-billion increase in the loan principal.

‘Refusal to Give Hacienda Luisita to Farmers’

Cory publicly promised in 1986 that Hacienda Luisita will be distributed to the farmers. However, in 1987, she issued Presidential Proclamation 131 and Executive Order No. 229 just days before her legislative powers were going to revert back to Congress, to include a provision in the Land Reform program for a “Stock Distribution Option”, which allows landowners to comply with the Land Reform Law without actually giving land to the farmers. Hacienda Luisita of course took this new option, and thus was not redistributed to the farmers.

‘Double Cross of Doy Laurel’

Cory had promised to Doy Laurel that she would let him run the government as Prime Minister after Marcos was ousted, as Cory had no experience in politics. However, in March 1986 she issued Presidential Proclamation No. 3 declaring a revolutionary government, and dissolving the 1973 Constitution. This nullified Laurel’s position as Prime Minister as the Parliament was abolished. This prompted Laurel to break ties with the Aquino regime later.

‘Protecting Hacienda Luisita’s Interests’

Cory continued to protect Hacienda Luisita, even firing Miriam Defensor Santiago from her post at the Department of Agrarian Reform after she told the press her opinion that Cory should inhibit herself as chair of the Presidential Agrarian Reform Council (PARC), which was tasked to make the final decision on Hacienda Luisita’s application for the “Stock Distribution Option” (see section on ‘Refusal to Give Hacienda Luisita to Farmers’ above).

‘Garchitorena Land Scam’

In 1988, a foreclosed property of the United Coconut Planters Bank (UCPB) was sold to Sharp International Marketing for P3.8 million. Before the sale was closed, Sharp tried to sell the same property to the government for P56 million. The sale was eventually approved by the Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR), but only after the price was inflated further to P65 million. The financier of the scam was Romeo Santos, an associate of Cory’s brother, Peping Cojuangco. He was also Cory’s campaign manager in Bicol.

SOURCES


- “The Philippines Cory, Coups and Corruption” by John Greenwald, Jay Branegan and Nelly Sindayen, http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,969186,00.html

- “Hacienda Luisita’s past haunts Noynoy’s future” by Stephanie Dychiu, http://www.gmanews.tv/story/181877/hacienda-luisitas-past-haunts-noynoys-future

- “Cory’s land reform legacy to test Noynoy’s political will” by Stephanie Dychiu, http://www.gmanews.tv/story/182195/corys-land-reform-legacy-to-test-noynoys-political-will

- “The Garchitorena land scam” by Stephanie Dychiu, http://www.gmanews.tv/story/182211/the-garchitorena-land-scam


References:

NOYNOY AQUINO- Daang Matuwid!

$
0
0

‘After three years and a month under Noynoy Aquino’s regime, corruption remains the most severe problem in the country.’

AFTER three years and a month under President Noynoy Aquino’s regime, corruption remains the most severe problem in the country, despite Aquino’s much vaunted “Tuwid na Daan” (Straight Path) mantra, which he kept on repeating ad nauseam in his annual State of the Nation Address (SONA) before Congress.

The extent of corruption averaged 4.4 points out of a scale of five, which is the extreme corruption level, according to the 2013 Global Corruption Barometer (GCB) survey conducted by Transparency International (TI) , a Berlin- based organization. In the perception of Filipino respondents of the TI survey, the degree of corrupt practices in the government, ranked among the highest in Asia, next only to Indonesians’ perception on their country’s corruption level which averaged at 4.7.

According to the survey, 44 percent of Filipino respondents said they would not report a corruption case because “it wouldn’t make a difference,” while 39 percent said they would not because they were “afraid of the consequences. However, 52 percent were willing to report incidences of corrupt practices to the news media, while only 21 percent said they would approach an anti-corruption agency or call an anti-graft hotline and another 21 percent would report directly to the institution involved.

The survey by TI also found that people have the least trust in institutions meant to help or protect them, including the police, the courts and the political parties. “Bribe paying levels remain very high worldwide, but people believe they have the power to stop corruption and the number of those willing to combat the abuse of power, secret dealings and bribery is significant,” TI said.

These TI findings were released during a recent TI Philippines forum which also showed that 62 percent of Filipino respondents believe the control of government is entirely and largely in the hands of a few oligarchs or big business.

The country, based on the survey, is high on the list of governments in Southeast Asia that’s firmly controlled by a few rich individuals in the perception of 72 percent of the respondents. Majority of those respondents also said personal connections are needed to speed up transactions with the government. 

One of the founders of TI Philippines, Judge Dolores Espanol, noted that 62 percent of respondents believe the government is firmly in the hands of big business. Political parties were rated as the second most corrupt because of their reputation during elections which are usually marred by vote buying and harassment, she said. Elected corrupt officials have the appointing power and their political parties are the ones who usually choose the persons appointed to certain positions in government.

An executive director of TI Philippines, Mona Lee Teves, said that as long as government control and influence are in the hands of a few rich individuals, there will be growth in the economy, but no development for the nation happens. “People will never benefit from economic progress because only the rich will grow richer,” she said. “Until we address this oligarch-and-clan domination, we will never address the root cause of corruption in the country.” 

 “Governments need to make sure that there are strong, independent and well-resourced institutions to prevent and redress corruption,“ Hugette Labelle, chair of Transparency International said. “Too many people are harmed when these core institutions and basic services are undermined by the scourge of corruption!”

The scourge of corruption has already infected the entire government under President Aquino, but, alas, he has eyes to see but does not want to see, ears to hear but does not want to hear all about it! 

***

Globally, corruption has worsened in the last two years, according to the “Corruption Barometer” of the TI, the biggest ever conducted by the Berlin-based watchdog, with 114,000 people responding in the survey of opinions on corruption and which institutions are most corrupt. 

The survey showed that a majority of people worldwide see governments as less effective in fighting it since the 2008 financial crisis. It found that political parties are considered to be the most corrupt, scoring 3.8 on a scale of five where one means “not at all corrupt” and five means “extremely corrupt.” Only 23 percent of those surveyed believed their government efforts to fight corruption were effective, down from 32 percent in 2008. The GCB showed “a crisis of trust in politics and real concern about the capacity of those institutions responsible for bringing criminals to justice.”

The second most corrupt on a global scale is the police with a score of 3.7. Three institutions – the executive, legislature, and judiciary branches of government – followed with equal scores of 3.6. Their officials/ public servants are supposed to be running the countries and upholding the rules of law, but they are seen as the most corrupt, judged to be abusing their positions of power and acting in their own interests rather than the citizens they are there to represent and serve. 

The survey also showed the business sector and the medical and health services scored 3.3 on the corruption barometer, while the education system came in next at eighth place with 3.2. The military was seen as the 10th most corrupt institution worldwide with 2.9, followed by NGOs in 11th place at 2.7, and religious bodies as the least corrupt institution with a 2.6 score. 

Transparency International is a global organization that campaigns against corruption. It has 90 chapters worldwide and tries to raise awareness of the damaging effects of corruption and works to develop and implement measures to tackle it.






Viewing all 28 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images